Plot of Score * Test = Gender

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information
Class Levels Values
Gender 2 Female Male

Number of Observations Read 64
Number of Observations Used 64

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis

The GLM Procedure
Least Squares Means

Gender Test1 LSMEAN Test2 LSMEAN Test3 LSMEAN Test4 LSMEAN
Female 12.3437500 13.9062500 16.6562500 21.9375000
Male 15.9687500 15.9062500 27.1875000 22.7500000

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis

The GLM Procedure
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance

Repeated Measures Level Information
Dependent Variable Test1 Test2 Test3 Test4
Level of Tests 1 2 3 4

MANOVA Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics
for the Hypothesis of no Tests Effect
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Tests
E = Error SSCP Matrix

S=1 M=0.5 N=29
Statistic Value F Value Num DF Den DF Pr > F
Wilks' Lambda 0.19620019 81.94 3 60 <.0001
Pillai's Trace 0.80379981 81.94 3 60 <.0001
Hotelling-Lawley Trace 4.09683498 81.94 3 60 <.0001
Roy's Greatest Root 4.09683498 81.94 3 60 <.0001

MANOVA Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics
for the Hypothesis of no Tests*Gender Effect
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Tests*Gender
E = Error SSCP Matrix

S=1 M=0.5 N=29
Statistic Value F Value Num DF Den DF Pr > F
Wilks' Lambda 0.45507804 23.95 3 60 <.0001
Pillai's Trace 0.54492196 23.95 3 60 <.0001
Hotelling-Lawley Trace 1.19742532 23.95 3 60 <.0001
Roy's Greatest Root 1.19742532 23.95 3 60 <.0001

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis

The GLM Procedure
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance
Tests of Hypotheses for Between Subjects Effects

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Gender 1 1151.753906 1151.753906 28.04 <.0001
Error 62 2546.273438 41.068926    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis

The GLM Procedure
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance of Contrast Variables
 
Tests_N represents the nth successive difference in Tests


Contrast Variable: Tests_1

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Mean 1 36.0000000 36.0000000 3.28 0.0748
Gender 1 42.2500000 42.2500000 3.85 0.0541
Error 62 679.7500000 10.9637097    


Contrast Variable: Tests_2

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Mean 1 3150.015625 3150.015625 111.44 <.0001
Gender 1 1164.515625 1164.515625 41.20 <.0001
Error 62 1752.468750 28.265625    


Contrast Variable: Tests_3

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Mean 1 11.390625 11.390625 0.48 0.4909
Gender 1 1511.265625 1511.265625 63.73 <.0001
Error 62 1470.343750 23.715222    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Parallel profiles

The GLM Procedure

Class Level Information
Class Levels Values
Gender 2 Female Male

Number of Observations Read 64
Number of Observations Used 64

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Parallel profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance

M Matrix Describing Transformed Variables
  Test1 Test2 Test3 Test4
MVAR1 1 -1 0 0
MVAR2 0 1 -1 0
MVAR3 0 0 1 -1

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Parallel profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Characteristic Roots and Vectors of: E Inverse * H, where
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Gender
E = Error SSCP Matrix

Variables have been transformed by the M Matrix
Characteristic Root Percent Characteristic Vector V'EV=1
MVAR1 MVAR2 MVAR3
1.19742532 100.00 0.00799523 -0.00615171 0.02141153
0.00000000 0.00 0.03752050 0.00143941 -0.00500999
0.00000000 0.00 0.02379822 0.03150046 0.02367240

MANOVA Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics for
the Hypothesis of No Overall Gender Effect
on the Variables Defined by the M Matrix Transformation
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Gender
E = Error SSCP Matrix

S=1 M=0.5 N=29
Statistic Value F Value Num DF Den DF Pr > F
Wilks' Lambda 0.45507804 23.95 3 60 <.0001
Pillai's Trace 0.54492196 23.95 3 60 <.0001
Hotelling-Lawley Trace 1.19742532 23.95 3 60 <.0001
Roy's Greatest Root 1.19742532 23.95 3 60 <.0001

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Parallel profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR1

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Gender 1 42.2500000 42.2500000 3.85 0.0541
Error 62 679.7500000 10.9637097    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Parallel profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR2

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Gender 1 1164.515625 1164.515625 41.20 <.0001
Error 62 1752.468750 28.265625    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Parallel profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR3

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Gender 1 1511.265625 1511.265625 63.73 <.0001
Error 62 1470.343750 23.715222    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Coincident profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance

M Matrix Describing Transformed Variables
  Test1 Test2 Test3 Test4
MVAR1 1 1 1 1

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Coincident profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Characteristic Roots and Vectors of: E Inverse * H, where
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Gender
E = Error SSCP Matrix

Variables have been transformed by the M Matrix
Characteristic Root Percent Characteristic Vector
V'EV=1
MVAR1
0.45232923 100.00 0.00990872

MANOVA Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics for
the Hypothesis of No Overall Gender Effect
on the Variables Defined by the M Matrix Transformation
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Gender
E = Error SSCP Matrix

S=1 M=-0.5 N=30
Statistic Value F Value Num DF Den DF Pr > F
Wilks' Lambda 0.68854911 28.04 1 62 <.0001
Pillai's Trace 0.31145089 28.04 1 62 <.0001
Hotelling-Lawley Trace 0.45232923 28.04 1 62 <.0001
Roy's Greatest Root 0.45232923 28.04 1 62 <.0001

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Coincident profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR1

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Gender 1 4607.01563 4607.01563 28.04 <.0001
Error 62 10185.09375 164.27571    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Level profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance

M Matrix Describing Transformed Variables
  Test1 Test2 Test3 Test4
MVAR1 1 -1 0 0
MVAR2 0 1 -1 0
MVAR3 0 0 1 -1

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Level profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Characteristic Roots and Vectors of: E Inverse * H, where
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Intercept
E = Error SSCP Matrix

Variables have been transformed by the M Matrix
Characteristic Root Percent Characteristic Vector V'EV=1
MVAR1 MVAR2 MVAR3
4.09683498 100.00 0.02787370 0.03186984 0.02018576
0.00000000 0.00 0.03541578 -0.00364718 -0.00231006
0.00000000 0.00 0.00261657 -0.00179042 0.02512240

MANOVA Test Criteria and Exact F Statistics for
the Hypothesis of No Overall Intercept Effect
on the Variables Defined by the M Matrix Transformation
H = Type III SSCP Matrix for Intercept
E = Error SSCP Matrix

S=1 M=0.5 N=29
Statistic Value F Value Num DF Den DF Pr > F
Wilks' Lambda 0.19620019 81.94 3 60 <.0001
Pillai's Trace 0.80379981 81.94 3 60 <.0001
Hotelling-Lawley Trace 4.09683498 81.94 3 60 <.0001
Roy's Greatest Root 4.09683498 81.94 3 60 <.0001

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Level profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR1

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Intercept 1 36.0000000 36.0000000 3.28 0.0748
Error 62 679.7500000 10.9637097    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Level profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR2

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Intercept 1 3150.015625 3150.015625 111.44 <.0001
Error 62 1752.468750 28.265625    

Gender Comparison on Psychological Tests
Profile Analysis
Level profiles

The GLM Procedure
Multivariate Analysis of Variance
 
Dependent Variable: MVAR3

Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F
Intercept 1 11.390625 11.390625 0.48 0.4909
Error 62 1470.343750 23.715222